JSF 1.2 vs JSF 2.0
Review the differences between JSF 1.2 and JSF 2.0 in a structured comparison table, then continue with related interview questions, quizzes, and similar topic comparisons.
Difference Between
JSF 1.2 vs JSF 2.0 - A key comparison and difference of the topics or subjects that will help you understand which is best for your use case. Check out to compare JSF 2.0 and JSF 1.2 as very common job interview questions.
Difference between JSF 1.2 and JSF 2.0
JSF 1.2 vs JSF 2.0 - A key comparison and difference of the topics or subjects that will help you understand which is best for your use case. Check out to compare JSF 2.0 and JSF 1.2 as very common job interview questions.
|
JSF 1.2
|
JSF 2.0
|
|---|---|
| Pure JSF without any bells and whistles specific to JSF 2 (Ajax stuff and such) - the difference won't be that great. What you have additionally in JSF 1.2 is the need to declare everything in a faces-config.xml file. | while in JSF 2.0 this has become mostly unnecessary. But that is not really where you lose the time. Only when you start to think about custom components will JSF 2.0 give you a faster development cycle because it has been made easier through facelets. |
| It take little more time than JSF 2.0 | What can save time is the additional support libraries that JSF 2.0 opens up for you. For example you have primefaces and Seam 3 at your disposal. Depending on your requirements they can save you plenty of effort. |
Save For Revision
Bookmark this item, mark it difficult, or place it in a revision set.
Log in to save bookmarks, difficult questions, and revision sets.
Related differences
Explore similar comparisons connected to JSF 1.2 and JSF 2.0 for broader context and interview preparation.
Get differences from below
Browse all available topic comparisons below, or use the search field above to narrow the list instantly.